I am reading Frederic Farrar's Life of Christ (written in 1870), and reflecting on what I have seen in my recent trip through Israel. One particular village has provoked thought.
We drove by a town in the Palestinian territories that has became a centre of the bomb attacks against Israelis some years ago, leading to the erection of the security wall that now blocks off easy access among the peoples. This same town is mentioned by Farrar as the frontier village of the Samaritans in Jesus' day - the village that refused to welcome Jesus, as St Luke records (Lk. 9:51-56). Why did they refuse Jesus on this journey? Previously he had been welcomed in Samaritan areas. Perhaps it was because of his destination - he was heading to Jerusalem, and was attended now by a crowd of followers. This village (En-gannim in ancient days) was the first Samaritan town on the border with Galilee. Their refusal to welcome Jesus led to his decision to avoid moving through Samaria; he struck east through Perea.
Farrar comments about this same village in his experience circa 1980: "The inhabitants of the village - who to this day are not remarkable for their civility to strangers. . . ". They had a reputation, he was told, of being "fanatical, rude and rebellious." It is interesting to learn that a particular village, in three widely different periods of history and with different cultures and religions, can show such similarity of attitude.
I am sure that there are real grievances behind local animosities and that these comments are generalisations untrue of many people. And of course, I have no personal knowledge in this matter. It is still worth pondering whether local cultural attitudes in districts have an abiding spiritual and moral fixity. What is going on spiritually in areas like these, to produce such a profile?
Responding to the sexual revolution
2 hours ago